Skip to main content

War of the Words

Did you know that the active definition of the word "literally" is "figuratively"?

Here is the active listing for "Literally" according to Merriam-Webster:
1:  in a literal sense or manner :  actually <took the remarkliterally> <was literally insane>
2
:  in effect :  virtually <will literally turn the world upside down to combat cruelty or injustice — Norman Cousins>


I am quite positive that sitting on some bookshelf in someone's home is a dictionary printed several decades ago. In that dictionary is a listing for the word literally which contains only one definition, and that being the literal one. 
On a parallel vein, we see words imported from other languages such as "bitch" or "fuck" which have a literal definition in their native tongue, but when used in America, have taken on much stronger and much more crass interpretations. I am quite sure that the first American to incorporate the use of "bitch" in their conversation was talking about a French breed of dog and was specifying between the male and female versions of the breed. In many dog training and dog breeding groups this word is still incorporated and encouraged in its purest form.
Similarly, we see a constant addition of words to the English vocabulary. For instance the word "ginormous" was recently recognized as an official word and was added to the dictionary. Our language is constantly evolving and changing based on the principal of semiotics.
:a general philosophical theory of signs and symbols that deals especially with their function in both artificially constructed and natural languages and comprises syntactics, semantics, and pragmatics
Basically, what you say will be interpreted by the listener through both the lens of culture, context, and personal perception. Each of us does this with any word or turn of phrase daily. 
Consider for instance, if I use the phrase "Life threw me a curve this morning", each of you will understand that a bit differently. From a cultural point of view you will probably recognize the phrase as meaning that something was difficult and unexpected in my morning. Within the context of our conversation you will understand if that is a bad thing or a good thing or just a surprise sort of thing. Your personal perception might hear this sentence from a baseball point of view and you might immediately jump to thinking about how a curve is shorthand for curveball and how a curve is yes, difficult to hit, but no more than a slider and how a good changeup is actually the most difficult pitch to hit and.............
.....and now the intended meaning of my sentence is partially lost due to interpretation. 
We all interpret things that we read and hear from day to day and we either perceive the intended meaning or we don't. If we don't, there are times that we probe for further clarification, and there are times that we start an argument because we misunderstand. 
For instance, the word "gay." Not but two generations ago this word meant "happy" and solely that. There is a lady in my congregation named Gay, and I am quite sure her parents named her that for her liveliness and not her taste in sexuality. Then, a generation passed and started using the word to mean "homosexual" and that was adopted as an alternate definition. Not because the word itself changed, but because our culture altered its meaning to a point that the dictionary editors felt the need to incorporate this new use. 
Enter our current generation. The term "gay" has been a hot-button for several years now and I am pleased to report that it has been largely in terms of equal rights and encouragement, instead of hatred and bigotry. Even the church has started embracing the word "gay" and not turning away people with this label (way to go church!). News stories have spread with multiple accounts of monogamous relationships and same-sex attraction individuals who use the term gay in order to show the public that someone claiming to be gay is not inherently a bad or evil or even odd thing at all. 
This generation is changing the definition of gay. Changing it from meaning queer or odd or unclean, to same-sex attraction, sophisticated, or even the new normal.
How do words change their meaning? By using them in specific contexts multiple times. We are currently changing the meaning of "gay" in a positive way and I hope that this swing continues. 
Words will come and words will go and their definitions will change as we allow them to. 
I, for one, hope and pray that the definition of "Christian" will be altered in people's minds when they get to know me. Instead of people hearing "Christian" and thinking of Westboro Baptist Church, or bigoted, or Pharisee, or "holier than thou", or "hoity toity", I want people to hear that I am a Christian and think of humility, faith, charitable, honest, and loving. 
I want to be someone who alters words towards better meanings and leaves the world as a better place because of the words I say and the things I do. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Casting A Conscientious Vote

Here's the thing America: you nominated two terrible representatives for public office--one "Republican" and one Democrat. Both of their campaign managers have decided that the strongest approach to get elected is to basically claim " at least I'm not them ." Both parties have released ad campaigns to bash the other candidate and both, I might argue, do so quite effectively. Now that I have successfully been persuaded that I should vote for neither candidate (thanks to the other candidate), I am left wondering who there is left to vote for. Certainly there is some candidate who is both qualified as a politician and as a person of reasonable morals?? Enter the 3rd party system. America was founded against a national party system (you can read about that here  for an enlightening time). And yet it is this national party system that has allowed a Democratic convert like Donald Trump to represent the Republican party. Trump knew that the only way to have a

Let's Stop Singing

S omeone recently shared an article with me titled " Let's Stop Singing These 10 Worship Songs ." The author, Corrie Mitchell, is making a point that there are some songs that have made it into the mainstream worship scene that are lyrically weak at best. I believe her ultimate goal is to encourage song writers both to be more conscientious of their lyrics to not neglect theological accuracy at the expense of prose--which is a noble and applauded effort. But with that said, here is my response to her article. Let's stop singing these 10 worship songs. That's right, there are too many important theological statements that are getting left out of worship songs. If congregants don't have the opportunity to proclaim the entire Gospel message in the course of one song then it isn't worth singing. After all, what if that is the only song they ever hear in a worship service? They will be left thinking that the Gospel message is incomplete. That Jesus only die

Jesus Doesn't Care Who You Vote For

There. I said it.  Of all the things Jesus cares about that you get to decide on a daily basis, who you cast your ballot for in the upcoming 2020 election is far from the top of the list.  Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Jesus doesn't care who the next president is--the Bible is pretty clear that God does care who the governing authorities are (Daniel 2:21)--fact is, he already knows who it will be!  What I am saying is that you have thousands of tiny decisions to make throughout your day. Most of which, God doesn't really care about: Do I wear my red tie or blue tie to work today?  Should I leave my house before rush hour traffic or at the last possible minute? How many helpings of Lucky Charms can I get away with before someone notices how light the box has become? Each decision has its own ripple effect and you have to live the consequences of each micro-decision. But most of our decisions on a day-to-day basis are pretty insignificant in the grand scheme of thing